FOLIA GEOGRAPHICA

Menu

Folia Geographica 2021, 63/2, pp. 5 - 18

GEOGRAPHY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION DEVELOPMENT AID ALLOCATION

Peter JANČOVIČ A*, Natália ZAGORŠEKOVÁ B, Andrianna BALEHA C

Received: March 24, 2021 | Revised: June 6, 2021 | Accepted: June 28, 2021

Paper No. 21-63/2-593

A* University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská cesta 1, 852 35 Bratislava, Slovakia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1470-9163
peter.jancovic@euba.sk (corresponding author)

B University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská cesta 1, 852 35 Bratislava, Slovakia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2424-729X
natalia.zagorsekova@euba.sk

C University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská cesta 1, 852 35 Bratislava, Slovakia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5460-768X
andrianna.baleha@euba.sk

 



FULL TEXT

Abstract
The European Union (EU), its institutions and Member States, represents the largest donor of development aid in the world. The present paper deals with the territorial distribution of EU’s official development assistance (ODA). The aim of this paper is to identify the major determinants affecting the territorial allocation of ODA provided by the EU institutions and to examine whether the geographical distribution of official development assistance of the European Union institutions is influenced more by donor interests or recipient needs. The paper is devoted to the theoretical basis determining the territorial distribution of the amount of ODA and to actual distribution of aid from the EU institutions among developing countries that are eligible to receive ODA. Based on OECD data on the EU institutions aid allocation between 2010 and 2019, we conclude that the distribution is influenced by both donor self-interest (EU interests) and recipient needs (developmental needs of recipient countries). However, the most significant determinant associated with higher amounts of total net ODA disbursements seems to be the European Neighbourhood Policy status as well as the European Union (potential) candidate status of the recipient countries. Therefore, EU’s geopolitical and geostrategic interests in its neighbourhood significantly influence the decision-making process on aid allocation.

Key words Aid allocation, European Union, official development assistance, ODA.

REFERENCES

  1. ALESINA, A., DOLLAR, D. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 33-63.
  2. ANDRESPOK, E., KASEKAMP, A. (2012). Development Cooperation of the Baltic States: A Comparison of the Trajectories of the Three New Donor Countries. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13, 1, 117-130.
  3. ASTERIOU, D., HALL, S. (2016). Applied Econometrics, 3rd edition. London: Palgrave.
  4. BERTHÉLEMY, J., TICHIT, A. (2002). Bilateral donors’ aid allocation decisions: A tree-dimensional panel analysis. In The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) [online]. no. 2002/123 [accessed on 17 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/52813/1/369444361.pdf.
  5. BOWLES, P. (1987). Foreign aid and domestic savings in less developed countries: Some tests for causality. In World Development, 15, 6, 789-796.
  6. BREUNING, M. (1995). Words and Deeds: Foreign Assistance Rhetoric and Policy Behaviour in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 2, 235-254.
  7. COORAY, N. S., SHAHIDUZZAMAN, Md. (2004). Determinants of Japanese aid allocation: An econometric analysis. In Journal of IUJ Research Institute [online]. no. 4 [accessed on 9 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://eprints.usq.edu.au/6295/4/Cooray_Shahiduzzaman_2004_PV.pdf.
  8. COUNCIL OF THE EU, 2020. Výročná správa na rok 2021 pre Európsku radu o cieľoch rozvojovej pomoci EÚ závery Rady. Retrieved from: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8628-2020-INIT/sk/pdf. Accessed on 9 March 2021.
  9. DUDLEY, L., MONTMAEQUETTE, C. (2012). Supply of foreign aid. American Economic Review, 66, 1, 132-142.
  10. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2017. The New European Consensus on Development ‘Our World, Our Dignity, Our Future’. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/european-consensus-on-development-final-20170626_en.pdf. Accessed on 28 January 2021.
  11. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2018. EU remains the world’s leading donor of development assistance: €75.7 billion in 2017. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_3002. Accessed on 10 March 2021.
  12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2020. Africa-EU cooperation. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/africa-eu-cooperation_en. Accessed on 21 February 2021.
  13. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2021. EU Aid Explorer. Retrieved from: https://euaidexplorer.ec.europa.eu/content/explore/recipients_en. Accessed on 15 June 2021.
  14. HARMÁČEK, J., SYROVÁTKA, M., OPRŠAL, Z. (2017). Factors of Czech Aid Selection and Allocation: Panel Probit and Tobit Analysis. Politická ekonomie, 65, 2, 179-197.
  15. HERRERA, C., ESCUELA, M. (2015). Analysis of Spain’s official development assistance: synthesis and reflections. In Scientific Journal of Economics and Business Management [online]. [accessed on 6 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://books.google.sk/books?hl=sk&lr=&id=_NghCgAAQBAJ.
  16. HOEFFLER, A., OUTRAM, V. (2008). Need, Merit or Self-Interest – What Determines the Allocation of Aid? Review of Development Economics, 15, 2008-2019.
  17. HOUT, W. (2013). Governance beyond the European Consensus on Development: What Drives EU Aid Selectivity? In University of Mainz [online]. [accessed on 16 June 2021]. Retrieved from: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/39277/.
  18. KAUFMANN, D., KRAAY, A., MASTRUZZI, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. In World Bank Policy Research Working Paper [online]. no. 5430 [accessed on 19 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1682130.
  19. KIM, Y., JENSEN, C. (2017). Preferences and institutions: constraints on European Union foreign aid distribution. Journal of European Integration, 40, 2, 177-192.
  20. LEBOVIC, J. (2005). Donor Positioning: Development Assistance from the U.S., Japan, France, Germany, and Britain. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 1, 119-126.
  21. MCGILLIVRAY, M. (2003). Modelling aid allocation: Issues, approaches and results. In The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) [online]. no. 2003/49 [accessed on 4 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/52825/1/369117875.pdf.
  22. NANCY, G., YONTCHEVA, B. (2006). Does Ngo Aid Go to the Poor? Empirical Evidence from Europe. In IMF Working Paper [online]. no. 06/39 [accessed on 12 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=892930.
  23. NEUMAYER, E. (2003). The Determinants of Aid Allocation by Regional Multilateral Development Banks and United Nations Agencies. Journal of International Studies Quarterly, 47, 1, 101-122.
  24. NEUMAYER, E. (2005). Is the Allocation of Food Aid Free from Donor Interest Bias? Journal of Development Studies, 41, 3, 392-411.
  25. OECD, 2015. Glossary. Development Co-operation Report 2015. Making Partnerships Effective Coalitions for Action. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/dcr-2015-60-en.pdf. Accessed on 15 March 2021.
  26. OECD, 2020. European Union institutions. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/c0ad1f0d-en/index.html. Accessed on 4 February 2021.
  27. OECD, 2021. Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions [DAC2a]. Retrieved from: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=TABLE2A#. Accessed on 8 March 2021.
  28. PAXTON, P., KNACK, S. (2008). Individual and Country-Level Factors Affecting Support for Foreign Aid. In Policy Research Working Paper [online]. no. 4714 [accessed on 4 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/6984/WPS4714.pdf.
  29. SELBERVIK, H., NYGAARD, K. (2006). Nordic Exceptionalism in Development Assistance? Aid Policies and the Major Donors: The Nordic Countries. In Chr. Michelsen Institute [online]. [accessed on 13 March 2021]. Retrieved from: https://www.cmi.no/publications/2371-nordic-exceptionalism-in-development-assistance.
  30. STUBBS, T. H., KENTIKELENIS, A. E., KING, L. P. (2016). Catalyzing Aid? The IMF and Donor Behavior in Aid Allocation. World Development, 78, 511-528.
  31. SZENT-IVÁNYI, B. (2012). Aid allocation of the emerging Central and Eastern European donors. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15, 1, 65-89.
  32. TUMAN, J., AYOUB, A. (2004). The Determinants of Japanese Official Development Assistance in Africa: A Pooled Time Series Analysis. International Interactions, 30, 1, 43-57.
  33. UNDP, 2021. Mean years of schooling (years). Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/103006. Accessed on 28 February 2021.
  34. WORLD BANK, 2021. Mortality Rate, Under-5 (Per 1,000 Live Births). Retrieved from: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/mortality-rate-under-5-1000-live-births-7. Accessed on 18 February 2021.
  35. ZENGIN, H., KORKMAZ, A. (2019). Determinants of Turkey’s foreign aid behaviour. New Perspectives on Turkey, 61, 109-135.