FOLIA GEOGRAPHICA

Folia Geographica 2022, 64/2, pp. 86–103

PERCEPTION, REALITY AND INTENT IN BIHOREAN TOURISM, ROMANIA

Grigore Vasile HERMAN A*, Norbert BANTO B, Laura Mariana HERMAN C, Mihaela UNGUREANU D, Katarína KOSTILNÍKOVÁ E, Ioana JOSAN F

Received: April 5, 2022 | Revised: September 2, 2022 | Accepted: September 9, 2022

Paper No. 22-64/2-644


A* University of Oradea, Faculty of Geography Tourism and Sport, 1 University Street, Oradea, Romania
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-6226
grigoreherman@yahoo.com (corresponding author)

B Bihor Destination Management Agency, Oradea, Romania
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3301-4578
bnorbert24@yahoo.com

C „Iosif Vulcan“ National College, Oradea, Romania
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4789-4617
lauralacatos@yahoo.com

D Bihor Destination Management Agency, Oradea, Romania
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-2426
umihaela59@yahoo.com

E University of Presov, Faculty of Humanities & Natural Sciences, 08001 Presov, Slovakia
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-2426
katarina.kostilnikova@smail.unipo.sk

F University of Oradea, Faculty of Geography Tourism and Sport, 1 University Street, Oradea, Romania
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9097-3310
ioanajosan2012@gmail.com


PDF FULL TEXT


Abstract
Tourism is one of the branches of the economy with a high growth rate, globally, having beneficial effects of a social, economic and ecological nature in the insertion environment, being at the same time a serious alternative in the development of local communities. In this context, the purpose of this study is to assess the perceptions and intentions of local public authorities regarding tourism, in parallel with quantifying the defining reality for tourism in Bihor County, Romania. The necessary information was obtained after consulting the representatives of 100 territorial administrative units, using a thematic questionnaire, consisting of 14 items. The results obtained aimed at identifying and quantifying the perceptions and intentions of the decision-makers of the territorial administrative units regarding tourism, against the background of the tourist situation, starting from the factual reality on the ground. Thus, following the quantification of the indicators studied, at the level of the Bihor Tourist Destination, the touristic perception (with a value of 75%, good) stood out, followed by the touristic intention (with a value of 44%, poor) and the touristic reality (with a value of 30.66%, weak). The results obtained at the level of UATs highlighted the existence of some major differences regarding the existing situation at the level of the Bihor Tourist Destination. In conclusion, this study can be a framework support for establishing strategic directions for the development of the tourist destination Bihor.

Key words
Tourist perception, tourist services, tourist intention, tourist development.


REFERENCES

  1. ASHIRALIEVICH, M.A. (2022). The Role of The Tourism Sector in The National Economy and Characteristics. Asian Journal of Technology & Management Research (AJTMR) ISSN, 2249(0892).
  2. BARROS, C. P., ASSAF, A. G. (2012). Analyzing tourism return intention to an urban destination. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 36(2), 216-231.
  3. BITTARELLO, M.B. (2008). Another time, another space: Virtual worlds, myths and imagination. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1), 1-18.
  4. BOULHILA, S., ALOUAT, M., REZZAZ, M.A. et al. (2022). Towards a development model of local cultural tourism through the involvement of local actors (Province of Constantine, Algeria). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 40(1), 9-19.
  5. BROKAJ, R. (2014). Local Governments role in the sustainable tourism development of a destination. European scientific journal, 10(31).
  6. BROUGHAM, J. E., BUTLER, R. W. (1981). A segmentation analysis of resident attitudes to the social impact of tourism. Annals of tourism research, 8(4), 569-590.
  7. BRYMAN, A. (2012). Social Research Methods, 4th edition. Oxford University Press, USA; 2012.
  8. CACIORA, T., HERMAN, G. V., ILIEȘ, A. et al. (2021). The use of virtual reality to promote sustainable tourism: A case study of wooden churches historical monuments from Romania. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1758.
  9. CHAKRABARTY, P., SADHUKHAN, S. K. (2020). Destination image for pilgrimage and tourism: A study in Mount Kailash region of Tibet. Folia Geographica, 62(2), 71-86.
  10. CHAN, W. C., LO, M. C., IBRAHIM, W. H. W. et al. (2022). The effect of hard infrastructure on perceived destination competitiveness: The moderating impact of mobile technology. Tourism Management Perspectives, 43, 100998.
  11. CHELCEA, S. (2007). Metodologia cercetării sociologice. Metode cantitative și calitative [Methodology of sociological research. Quantitative and qualitative methods]. Editura Economică, Bucharest.
  12. ÇIZEL, B., KIRTIL, İ. G., AŞKUN, V. et al. (2022). Symmetric and asymmetric analysis of tourist behavioral intention’s antecedents. Quality & Quantity, 1-2.
  13. CUI, F., LIU, Y., CHANG, Y. et al. (2016). An overview of tourism risk perception. Natural Hazards, 82(1), 643-658.
  14. DEHOORNE, O., OLĂU, V.M., CACIORA, T. (2019). Tourist resources assesement in Pădurea Craiului Mountains. Folia Geographica, 61(2), 163-171.
  15. DEMENCHUK, E., ILIES, D.C., WENDT, A.J. et al. (2020). Spectroscopy Study of Heritage Objects for the Digitisation of Cultural Heritage. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 19(6), 1057-1066.
  16. DESAI, P.R., DESAI, P.N., AJMERA, K.D. et al. (2014). A review paper on oculus Rift-A virtual. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (Technology), 13(4), 175-179.
  17. DRĂGHICI, C.D., PINTILII, R.D., PEPTENATU, D. et al. (2015). The role of SPA tourism in the development of local economies from Romania. Procedia Economics and finance, 23, 1573-1577.
  18. DUMAN, T., MATTILA, A. S. (2005). The role of affective factors on perceived cruise vacation value. Tourism management, 26(3), 311-323.
  19. FERREIRA, D. I. R., & SÁNCHEZ-MARTÍN, J. M. (2022). The Assessment of the Tourism Potential of the Tagus International Nature Reserve Landscapes. Contraposition of Methods Based on the Opinion of the Demand. Land, 11(1), 68.
  20. GARCÍA-BUADES, M. E., GARCÍA-SASTRE, M. A., ALEMANY-HORMAECHE, M. (2022). Effects of overtourism, local government, and tourist behavior on residents’ perceptions in Alcúdia (Majorca, Spain). Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 39, 100499.
  21. GAO, B. W., ZHU, C., SONG, H. et al. (2022). Interpreting the perceptions of authenticity in virtual reality tourism through postmodernist approach. Information Technology & Tourism, 24(1), 31-55.
  22. GELTER, J., FUCHS, M., LEXHAGEN, M. (2022). Making sense of smart tourism destinations: A qualitative text analysis from Sweden. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 23, 100690.
  23. GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA, R. J., MÁRTÍNEZ-RICO, G., BAÑULS-LAPUERTA, F. et al. (2022). Residents’ perception of the impact of sports tourism on sustainable social development. Sustainability, 14(3), 1232.
  24. GRECU, A., GRUIA, A. K., MARIN, M. et al. (2019). Specificity of sustainable structural dynamics of local economy in Romanian tourist resorts. Sustainability, 11(24), 7155.
  25. HERMAN, G. V., DEAC, A. L., CIOBOTARU, A. M. et al. (2017). The role of tourism in local economy development. Bihor County case study. Urbanism. Architecture. Constructions/Urbanism.Arhitectura. Constructii, 8(3), 265-274.
  26. HERMAN, G. V., PEPTENATU, D., GRAMA, V. et al. (2018). Tourism and Local Development. Study Case: Băile Felix-Băile 1 Mai Tourism System, Bihor County, Romania. Analele Universitatii din Oradea, Seria Geografie, 28(1), 131-137.
  27. HERMAN, G. V., WENDT, A. J., DUMBRAVĂ, R. et al. (2019). The role and importance of promotion centers in creating the image of tourist destination: Romania. Geographia Polonica, 92(4), 443-454.
  28. HERMAN, G.V., CACIORA, T., ILIES, D.C. et al., (2020a). 3D Modeling of the Cultural Heritage: Between Opportunity and Necessity. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 10(1), 27-30.
  29. HERMAN G. V., BANTO N., CACIORA T. et al. (2020b). Tourism in Bihor County, Romania. Trends and Prospects. Folia Geographica, 62(2), 87-105.
  30. HERMAN, G. V., GRAMA, V., SONKO, S. M. et al. (2020c). Online information premise in the development of Bihor tourist destination, Romania. Folia Geographica, 62(1), 21-34.
  31. HERMAN, G.V., BANTO, N., CACIORA, T. et al. (2021). The Perception of Bihor Mountain Tourist Destination from Romania. Geographia Polonica, 94(4), 143-158.
  32. ILIEȘ, D. C., MARCU, F., CACIORA, T. et al. (2021). Investigations of museum indoor microclimate and air quality. Case study from Romania. Atmosphere, 12(2), 286.
  33. ILIEȘ, D. C., SAFAROV, B., CACIORA, T. et al. (2022). Museal Indoor Air Quality and Public Health: An Integrated Approach for Exhibits Preservation and Ensuring Human Health. Sustainability, 14(4), 2462.
  34. IM, Y., KIM, C. (2022). A study on hotel employees’ perceptions of the fourth industrial technology. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 51, 559-567.
  35. JOHANNES, J., YACOB, S., PASARIBU, J. P. K. (2022). Examining the behavioral intentions of tourism destination communities: A critical approach to smart rural tourism information system. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(2), 329-335.
  36. KHABIBULLOYEVNA, K. S., ERGASHOVNA, L. M. (2022). The Importance of Developing Sustainable Tourism. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management And Finance, 3(4), 49-56.
  37. KIM, Y., RIBEIRO, M. A., LI, G. (2022). Tourism memory, mood repair and behavioral intention. Annals of tourism research, 93, 103369.
  38. KLAMÁR, R., MATLOVIČ, R., MITURA, T. et al. (2017). Development of geoturism and mining heritage on the examples of Slovak opal mines and oil mine Bóbrka. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 17, 241-248.
  39. KO, D. W., STEWART, W. P. (2002). A structural equation model of residents’ attitudes for tourism development. Tourism management, 23(5), 521-530.
  40. LEE, H. Y., BONN, M. A., REID, E. L., et al. (2017). Differences in tourist ethical judgment and responsible tourism intention: An ethical scenario approach. Tourism Management, 60, 298-307.
  41. LEÓN-GÓMEZ, A., RUIZ-PALOMO, D., FERNÁNDEZ-GÁMEZ, M. A. et al. (2021). Sustainable tourism development and economic growth: Bibliometric review and analysis. Sustainability, 13(4), 2270.
  42. LIU, J. C., VAR, T. (1986). Resident attitudes toward tourism impacts in Hawaii. Annals of tourism research, 13(2), 193-214.
  43. LOUREIRO, S. M. C., GUERREIRO, J., & ALI, F. (2020). 20 years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: A text-mining approach. Tourism Management, 77, 104028.
  44. MATLOVIČ, R., & MATLOVIČOVÁ, K. (2016). The position of tourism and territorial marketing in the context of paradigmatic change to tertiary geography education in Slovakia. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 18(2), 133-144.
  45. MATLOVIČ, R., VLČKOVÁ, V., MATLOVIČOVÁ, K. (2015). Religiosity in Slovakia after the Social Change in 1989. In Brunn, S.D., ed., The Changing World Religion Map. Sacred Places, Identities, Practises and Politics. Part V. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1031-1045.
  46. MATLOVIČOVÁ, K., TIRPÁKOVÁ, E., & MOCÁK, P. (2019). City brand image: semiotic perspective a case study of Prague. Folia Geographica, 61(1), 120.
  47. MATLOVIČOVÁ, K., & HUSÁROVÁ, M. (2017). Potential of the Heritage Marketing in Tourist Destinations Development. Cicva Castle Ruins Case Study (Heritage marketing a moznosti jeho vyuzitia pri rozvoji turistickej destinacie. Pripadova studia hradu Cicva). Folia Geographica, 59(1), 5-35.
  48. MOGHAL, A., JAIN, D., MUKHOPADHYAY, D. et al. (2022). Nexus Between Tourism and Economic Development in Jammu And Kashmir: A Review. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 26(1), 1-8.
  49. MOREIRA GREGORI, P. E., ROMAN, C., MARTÍN, J. C. (2022). Residents’ perception of a mature and mass tourism destination: The determinant factors in Gran Canaria. Tourism Economics, 28(2), 515-534.
  50. MURA, P., TAVAKOLI, R., PAHLEVAN SHARIF, S. (2016). Authentic but not too much: exploring perceptions of authenticity of virtual tourism. Information Technology & Tourism, 17(2), 145–159.
  51. MURPHY, P. E. (1981). Community attitudes to tourism: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Tourism Management, 2(3), 189-195.
  52. OCIEPA-KUBICKA, A., PACHURA, P. (2015). Tourism as an Economic Activity form in Commune Olsztyn, Poland. Folia geographica, 57(2), 5-15.
  53. PEPTENATU, D., DRAGHICI, C. C., PAPUC, R. M. et al. (2015). Modeling the preeminent of the tourism function in the dynamics of the territorial systems with mineral water resources. In 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM (pp. 415-422).
  54. PÉREZ-CALDERÓN, E., MIGUEL-BARRADO, V., SÁNCHEZ-CUBO, F. (2022). Tourism Business in Spanish National Parks: A Multidimensional Perspective of Sustainable Tourism. Land, 11(2), 190.
  55. PETROSILLO, I., ZURLINI, G., CORLIANO, M. E. et al. (2007). Tourist perception of recreational environment and management in a marine protected area. Landscape and urban planning, 79(1), 29-37.
  56. PINTILII, R. D., PEPTENATU, D., CIOBOTARU, A. M. et al. (2017). Creative economies in Romania-spatial projections and trends. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, (37), 95-108.
  57. PINTILII, R. D., PEPTENATU, D., GRECU, A. et al. (2016). Tourism, basic functionality versus complementary component of the territorial systems in Romania. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 32, 364-372.
  58. PIZAM, A., NEUMANN, Y., REICHEL, A. (1978). Dimentions of tourist satisfaction with a destination area. Annals of tourism Research, 5(3), 314-322.
  59. PRIMA, S. (2022). A Study of Perception of the Importance of English Language Skills among Indonesian Hotel Employees. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 9(1), 73-86.
  60. RAHA, S., GAYEN, S. K. (2022). Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process and weighted sum techniques for green tourism potential mapping in the Gangetic West Bengal, India. GeoJournal, 1-44.
  61. SHARPLEY, R. (2014). Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research. Tourism Management, 42, 37-49.
  62. SUH, Y. K., & MCAVOY, L. (2005). Preferences and trip expenditures—a conjoint analysis of visitors to Seoul, Korea. Tourism Management, 26(3), 325-333.
  63. SUHEL, S., BASHIR, A. (2018). The role of tourism toward economic growth in the local economy. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(1), 32-39.
  64. TOKHIROVICH, T. K. (2021). The Role and Importance of Tourism in the Economy of Small Regions. International Journal of Culture and Modernity, 9, 62-66.
  65. TSE, S., TUNG, V. W. S. (2022). Measuring the valence and intensity of residents’ behaviors in host–tourist interactions: implications for destination image and destination competitiveness. Journal of Travel Research, 61(3), 565-580.
  66. WALL, G., ALI, I. M. (1977). The impact of tourism in Trinidad and Tobago. Annals of Tourism Research, 5, 43-49.
  67. WANG, W., WATANABE, M., ONO, K. et al., (2022). Exploring Visualisation Methodology of Landscape Design on Rural Tourism in China. Buildings, 12(1), 64.
  68. WEAVER, D. B., LAWTON, L. J. (2001). Resident perceptions in the urban–rural fringe. Annals of tourism research, 28(2), 439-458.
  69. WENDT, J.A., BUHAȘ, R., HERMAN, G.V. (2019). Eхperience of the Baile-Felix Tourist System (Romania) for the Protection and Promotion of the Grey Seal as a Brend on the Hel Peninsular (Poland). The Baltic Region, 11(1), 109-136.
  70. XIAO, H., CHENG, J., WANG, X. (2018). Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote sustainable development? Evidence from countries along the Belt and Road. Sustainability, 10(12), 4370.
  71. ZEKAN, B., WEISMAYER, C., GUNTER, U. et al. (2022). Regional sustainability and tourism carrying capacities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130624.
  72. ZENG, Y., LIU, L., & XU, R. (2022). The Effects of a Virtual Reality Tourism Experience on Tourist’s Cultural Dissemination Behavior. Tourism and Hospitality, 3(1), 314-329.
  73. ZHU, H., DENG, F. (2020). How to influence rural tourism intention by risk knowledge during COVID-19 containment in China: Mediating role of risk perception and attitude. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(10), 3514.