FOLIA GEOGRAPHICA

Menu

Folia Geographica 2025, 67/2, pp. 96-130

QUALITY OF LIFE UNDER PRESSURE:
SPATIAL INEQUALITIES ACROSS EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
IN THE AGE OF POLYCRISIS

Kvetoslava MATLOVIČOVÁA, Radoslav KLAMÁRB*, Monika IVANOVÁC

Received: March 31, 2025 | Revised: November 18, 2025 | Accepted: November 22, 2025

Paper No. 25-67/2-750


A* University of Economics in Bratislava, Department of Tourism, Slovakia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9635-4177
     kvetoslava.matlovicova@euba.sk 

B  University of Presov, Department of Geography, Slovakia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-8412
     radoslav.klamar@unipo.sk (corresponding author)

C  University of Presov, Department of Geography, Slovakia
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2015-4918
     monika.ivanova@unipo.sk 

 

FULL TEXT


Abstract
The study aims to examine the spatiotemporal aspects of quality-of-life differentiation across European countries in 2018 and 2023, with consideration of the potential impacts of the polycrisis. Specifically, we identify and quantify the key determinants of quality of life and the latent factors shaping it. We also assess the potential shifts that occurred between 2018 and 2023, as well as whether and to what extent disparities among the observed countries have deepened or diminished. The research is based on a set of 27 quality-of-life indicators grouped into eight thematic domains, following the Eurostat database section titled Quality of Life (QoL). To evaluate and compare QoL across countries, the study employs a scoring method, correlation and regression analyses, and principal component analysis (PCA). The results confirm the existence of a northwest– southeast axis of differentiation among European countries. The highest levels of quality of life are consistently observed in Switzerland, Norway, and the countries of Northern and Western Europe, whereas those of Southern and Southeastern Europe remain at the opposite end of the spectrum. PCA results reveal the dominance of factors associated with material living conditions, the working environment, and socio-cultural participation. The analysis demonstrates that the polycrisis has affected the hierarchy of individual expectations. These changes are corroborated by both correlation and PCA analyses, which indicate an increased importance of indicators reflecting economic resilience. Specifically, in high-welfare countries, the polycrisis has reduced the relative importance of satisfaction and happiness (a decline in the significance of indicators C and ZA), whereas in economically weaker countries it has heightened the emphasis on material security and resistance to financial shocks. Quality of life in the context of a polycrisis is therefore not merely a reflection of economic parameters but also of the resilience of social and institutional structures within individual countries.The findings suggest that the polycrisis has not led to a convergence in living conditions; on the contrary, it has often exacerbated disparities in quality of life, primarily through the deterioration of economic security and subjective well-being.

Key words
Quality of life, polycrisis, resilience, spatial inequalities, European countries.


REFERENCES

  1. ALLARDT, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study. Acta Sociologica, 19(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169937601900302.
  2. ANDRÁŠKO, I. (2005). Dve dimenzie kvality života v kontexte percepcií obyvateľov miest a vidieckych obcí. In: Vaishar, A., Ira, V. (eds.) Geografická organizace Česka a Slovenska v současném období, Brno: Ústav geoniky AV ČR, 6-13.
  3. ANDRÁŠKO, I. (2006). Sociálno-demografická dimenzia kvality života v Bratislave (vo svetle multivariačnej analýzy. Folia Geographica, 10, ISSN 1336-6157, 10-17.
  4. ANDRÁŠKO, I. (2008). Regionálne typy vnútornej štruktúry Bratislavy z hľadiska kvality životných podmienok. Geographia Slovaca, 25, 159-173.
  5. AVDIC, A., AVDIC, B. (2023). Center and Periphery in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Social and Spatial Indicators of Regional Disparities. Folia Geographica 65(2), 103-126.
  6. BABINČÁK, P. (2014). Kritériá pre meranie kvality života v psychológii a ich aplikácia prostredníctvom rozdielového modelu kvality života. Psychologie pro praxi, 1-2, XLIX, 77-87.
  7. BECK, U. (2009). World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press, 269 s.
  8. BÉNÉ, C., NEWSHAM, A., DAVIES, M., ULRICHS, M., GODFREY-WOOD, R. (2014). Review article: Resilience, poverty and development. Journal of International Development, 26(5), 598–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2992.
  9. ČAUŠEVIĆ A., (2023). The Impact of the War Between Russia and Ukraine on the Attitudes of the Inhabitants Regarding Tourist Trips: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Folia Geographica 65(2), pp. 31-52.
  10. DIENER, E., EMMONS, R. A., LARSEN, R. J., & GRIFFIN, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
  11. DIENER, E., SUH, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social indicators research, 40, 189-216.
  12. DIENER, E. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.
  13. DŽUKA, J. (2013): Multidimenzionálny model subjektívne hodnotenej kvality života a jeho empirické overenie – výsledky predvýskumu. Československá psychologie, 57(5), 474-487.
  14. EUROFOUND (2022). Fifth round of the Living, working and COVID-19 e-survey: Living in a new era of uncertainty. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2806/190361.
  15. EUROSTAT (2024). Quality of life indicators (database). European Commission, Eurostat.
    https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/quality-of-life.
  16. ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press, 218 p.
  17. FOLKE, C., BIGGS, R., NORSTRÖM, A. V., REYERS, B., ROCKSTRÖM, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341.
  18. HALÁS, M., KLADIVO, P. (2012): Quality of life in an urban environment: a typology of urban units of Olomouc. Quaestiones Geographicae, 31 (2), 49-60, DOI: 10.2478/v10117-012-0018-4.
  19. HELLIWELL, J., LAYARD, R., SACHS, J. (2022). World Happiness Report 2022. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2022.
  20. HEŘMANOVÁ, E. (2012). Kvalita života a její modely v současném sociálním výzkumu. Sociológia, 44, č. 4, 407-425.
  21. HOMER-DIXON, T., WALKER, B., BIGGS, R., CRÉPIN, A.-S., FOLKE, C., LAMBIN, É. F., PETERSON, G., ROCKSTRÖM, J., SCHEFFER, M., STEFFEN, W., & TROELL, M. (2015). Synchronous failure: The emerging causal architecture of global crisis. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07681-200306.
  22. HORŇÁK, M., ROCHOVSKÁ, A. (2007). Vybrané aspekty kvality života vo vnútorných perifériách Slovenska. Geographia Cassoviensis, 1, 55-60.
  23. INGLEHART, F. R. (2018). Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 288 s.
  24. IRA, V., ŠUŠKA, P. (2006). Percepcia kvality života v mestskom prostredí (na príklade mesta Partizánske). Geografická revue, 2, 309–332.
  25. IRA, V., ANDRÁŠKO, I. (2007). Kvalita života z pohľadu humánnej geografie. Geografický časopis, 59, 159-179.
  26. IRA, V., MURGAŠ, F. (2008). Geografický pohľad na kvalitu života a zmeny v spoločnosti na Slovensku. Geographia Slovaca, 25, 7-24.
  27. IVANOVÁ, M., KLAMÁR, R., FECKOVÁ ŠKRABUĽÁKOVÁ, E. (2022). Identification of Factors Influencing the Quality of Life in European Union Countries Evaluated by Principal Component Analysis. Geographica Pannonica 26, 1, 13–29, doi: 10.5937/gp26-34191.
  28. KLAMÁR, R., MATLOVIČ, R., IVANOVÁ, M., IŠTOK, R., KOZOŇ, J. (2019). Local Action Group as a Tool of Inter-municipal Cooperation: Case Study of Slovakia. Folia Geographica, 61(1), ISSN 1336-6157, 36-67.
  29. LAGAS, P., VAN DONGEN, F., VAN RIJN, F., VISSER, H. (2015). Regional quality of living in Europe. REGION, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), 2, 2, ISSN 2409-5370, 1-26, http://dx.doi.org/10.18335/region.v2i2.43.
  30. MATLOVIČ, R., MATLOVIČOVÁ, K. (2012). The Social Relevance and Branding of Geography 2012. Geografie 117(1), pp.33-51.
  31. MATLOVIČ, R., MATLOVIČOVÁ, K. (2016). The position of tourism and territorial marketing in the context of paradigmatic change to tertiary geography education in Slovakia, Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 2016, 18(2), pp. 133–144.
  32. MATLOVIČ, R. a MATLOVIČOVÁ, K. (2024). Polycrisis in the Anthropocene as Key Research Agenda for Geography: Ontological Delineation and the Shift to a Postdisciplinary Approach. Folia Geographica, 66(1), 5–33.
  33. MATLOVIČ, R. a MATLOVIČOVÁ, K. (2025). The Metamodern Shift in Geographical Thought: Oscillatory Ontology and Epistemology, Post-disciplinary and Post-paradigmatic Perspectives. Folia Geographica, 67(1), 22–69.
  34. MATLOVIČOVÁ, K. (2024). The Triadic Nexus: Understanding the Interplay and Semantic Boundaries Between Place Identity, Place Image, and Place Reputation. Folia Geographica 66(1), pp. 69-102.
  35. MACKŮ, K., VOŽENÍLEK, V. (2019). Statistická syntéza indikátorů kvality života – návrh tvorby indexu v evropských regionech. Geographia Cassoviensis, XII(2), 196-209.
  36. MELOUN, M., MILITKÝ, J., HILL, M. (2012). Statistická analýza vícerozměrných dat v příkladech. Praha: Academia, 750 s.
  37. MURGAŠ, F. (2016). Geographical conceptualization of quality of life. Ekológia, 35, 4, 309-319, DOI:10.1515/eko-2016-0025.
  38. MURGAŠ, F., MACKŮ, K., GREŽO, H., PETROVIČ, F. (2023). The concept of quality of life and its application using the World Value Survey Wave 7: Slovak experience. GeoJournal, 88, 6285-6302, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10969-5.
  39. MURGAŠ, F., TIRPÁKOVÁ, A., & PETROVIČ, F. (2023). Self-Reported Health of University Students in Slovakia During the End Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on the Quality of Life. Folia Geographica, 65(2), 78–102.
  40. NOLAN, B. (2021). Social inequality and welfare states in crisis. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(4), 389–403.
  41. NOLL, H.-H. (2002). Towards a European system of social indicators: Theoretical framework and system architecture. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3), 47–87.
  42. OECD (2020). How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing. 244 s.
  43. OECD (2024). How’s Life? Well-being Database: Definitions and Metadata. Paris: OECD Publishing. (online dataset).
  44. ODKLADAL, M. (2023). Európsky kráľ bankrotov Grécko sa nakoniec zachránilo a definitívne odvrátilo svoj krach. Retrieved from: https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/kUGWtEl/europsky-kral-bankrotov-grecko-sa-nakoniec-zachranilo-a-definitivne-odvratilo-svoj-krach/ (Accessed on 10.9.2024).
  45. PETROVIČ, F., MURGAŠ, F. (2020). Holistic and Sustainable Quality of Life – Conceptualization and Application. Folia Geographica, 62, 1, ISSN 1336-6157, 77-94.
  46. PACIONE, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being – a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19-30.
  47. RAKOWSKI, J. J. (2025). Understanding the Polycrisis: Interlinked Risks and the Dynamics of Societal Resilience. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 50(1). Advance online publication.
  48. RAWORTH, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing, 384 p.
  49. RIŠOVÁ, K. (2016). Meranie subjektívnej a objektívnej dimenzie kvality života z geografického hľadiska – prehľad prístupov. Folia Geographica, 58 (2), ISSN 1336-6157, 54-69.
  50. ROCKSTRÖM, J., STEFFEN, W., NOONE, K., PERSSON, Å., CHAPIN, F. S. III, LAMBIN, E. F., LENTON, T. M., SCHEFFER, M., FOLKE, C., SCHELLNHUBER, H. J., NYKVIST, B., DE WIT, C. A., HUGHES, T., VAN DER LEEUW, S., RODHE, H., SÖRLIN, S., SNYDER, P. K., COSTANZA, R., SVEDIN, U., FALKENMARK, M., KARLBERG, L., CORELL, R. W., FABRY, V. J., HANSEN, J., WALKER, B., LIVERMAN, D., RICHARDSON, K., CRUTZEN, P., FOLEY, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
  51. SAMUELSSON, K., BARTHEL, S., COLDING, J., MACASSA, G., GIUSTI, M. (2019). Urban resilience at eye level: Spatial analysis of empirically defined experiential landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 190, 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103590.
  52. SHRIVASTAVA, P., ZSOLNAI, L. (2022). Wellbeing-oriented organizations: Connecting human flourishing with ecological regeneration. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(2), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12421.
  53. SIIRILÄ, J., SALONEN, A.O. (2024). Towards a sustainable future in the age of polycrisis. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, 1436740. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1436740.
  54. STEFFEN, W., RICHARDSON, K., ROCKSTRÖM, J., CORNELL, S. E., FETZER, I., BENNETT, E. M., BIGGS, R., CARPENTER, S. R., DE VRIES, W., DE WIT, C. A., FOLKE, C., GERTEN, D., HEINKE, J., MACE, G. M., PERSSON, L. M., RAMANATHAN, V., REYERS, B., SÖRLIN, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
  55. STIGLITZ, J. E., SEN, A., & FITOUSSI, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris: CMEPSP, 291 p.
  56. THE WHOQOL GROUP. (1998). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science & Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.
  57. TOOZE, A. (2022). The polycrisis: What it is and why it matters. (Verejná prednáška / esej publikovaná online).
  58. VEENHOVEN, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Ordering Concepts and Measures of the Good Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1-39.
  59. WOŹNIAK, B., TOBIASZ-ADAMCZYK, B. (2014). Quality of life and well-being. Working paper no 1.5 “Gender Equality and Quality of Life – State of Art Report“, 22 p., chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://geq.socjologia.uj.edu.pl/documents/32447484/75036585/WP1.5.Tobiasz_Adamczyk_Wo%C5%BAniak_quality_of_life.pdf.