FOLIA GEOGRAPHICA

Menu

Folia Geographica 2023, 65/1, pp. 66-78

ARMENIAN RETURN MIGRATION IN THE DISCOURSE OF LOCAL ELITE

Lucie MACKOVÁ A*, Vladimír IRA B,C

Received: April 17, 2023 | Revised: May 14, 2023 | Accepted: May 16, 2023

Paper No. 23-65/1-670

A* Palacký University Olomouc, 771 46, Olomouc, Czechia
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-7476
lucie.mackova@upol.cz (corresponding author)

B Institute of Geography of the SAS, 814 73, Bratislava, Slovakia
C University of South Bohemia, 371 15, České Budějovice, Czechia
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-865X
geogira@savba.sk


PDF FULL TEXT

Abstract
The study is based on interviews with 32 experts on international migration conducted in Yerevan in 2016. This paper aims to analyse their perspectives on return migration, which go beyond the dichotomy of the return as a failure or success. Armenia has a large diaspora and only few migrants and members of the diaspora decide to go back. However, there are such cases and they merit our attention and further analysis. The transnational turn in migration studies showed the importance of the return and the ways how the migration cycle can never be completed. Narratives among the key informants revolve around the issue of old and new diaspora and diasporic consciousness (or patriotism), the issue of a weak state after the dissolution of the former Soviet Union, and uneven development. All of these themes incorporate the top-down and bottom-up perspectives, even though they are a part of the discourse of the key informants working on migration issues and members of the local elite. This study will also highlight the significance of return migration and the Armenian diaspora for the Armenian society’s changes.

Key words
Return migration, diaspora, transnationalism, elite discourse, Armenia.

REFERENCES

  1. Al Jazeera (2017). Syrian Refugees Improve Armenia’s Social Fabric. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/12/refugees-improve-armenia-social-fabric-171214061224398.html. [Accessed 23 August 2022].
  2. BOGNER, A., LITTING, B., MENZ, W. (2009). Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. CARLING, J. (2004). Emigration, return and development in Cape Verde: The impact of closing borders. Population, Space and Place, 10, 2, 113-132.
  4. CERASE, F.P. (1974). Expectations and reality: a case study of return migration from the United States to Southern Italy. International Migration Review, 8, 2, 245-262.
  5. CONSTANT, A., MASSEY, D.S. (2002). Return migration by German guestworkers: Neoclassical versus new economic theories. International Migration, 40, 4, 5-38.
  6. CRESSWELL, J. W. (2002). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  7. De HAAS, H., FOKKEMA, T., FIHRI, M.F. (2015). Return migration as failure or success? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 16, 2, 415-429.
  8. De HAAS, H. (2012). The migration and development pendulum: A critical view on research and policy. International Migration, 50, 3, 8-25.
  9. DEXTER, L. A. (1970). Elite and specialized interviewing. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
  10. European Training Foundation (2013). Migration and skills in Armenia. Available at: http://www.etf.europa.eu/web.nsf/pages/Migration_and_skills_Armenia. [Accessed 23 August 2018].
  11. FLEISCHER, A. (2012). A statistical overview on return migration to the Republic of Armenia. CRIS analytical note, 2012/01. Available at: http://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/21297. [Accessed 4 May 2022].
  12. GRIGORIAN, D., MELKONYAN, T. A. (2011). Destined to Receive: The Impact of Remittances on Household Decisions in Armenia. Review of Development Economics, 15, 1, 139-153.
  13. HARRIS, J.R., TODARO, M.P. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. The American Economic Review, 60, 1, 126-142.
  14. HAVRYLIUK, O., GNATIUK, O., MEZENTSEV, K. (2021). Suburbanization, but centralization? Migration patterns in the post-Soviet functional urban region – evidence from Kyiv. Folia Geographica, 63, 1, 64-84.
  15. HAY, I., COPE, M. eds. (2021). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography Fifth Edition. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press Canada.
  16. IOM (2021). Return and reintegration key highlights 2021. IOM, Geneva. Available at: https://publications.iom.int/books/return-and-reintegration-key-highlights-2021. [Accessed 14 May 2023].
  17. KING, R. (2002). Towards a New Map of European Migration. International Journal of Population Geography, 8, 89-106.
  18. KOCH, A. (2014). The politics and discourse of migrant return: the role of UNHCR and IOM in the governance of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 6, 905-923.
  19. LACHMANOVÁ, L., DRBOHLAV, D. (2004). The Probable Future Development of European East-West Migration. European Spatial Research and Policy, 11, 1, 136-155.
  20. LEVITT, P., LAMBA-NIEVES, D. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37, 1, 1-22.
  21. LEVITT, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32, 4, 926-948.
  22. LIETAERT, I., DERLUYN, I., BROEKAERT, E. (2014). Returnees’ perspectives on their re-migration process. International Migration, 52, 5, 144-158.
  23. LIETAERT, I., DERLUYN, I., BROEKAERT, E. (2017). The boundaries of transnationalism: the case of assisted voluntary return migrants. Global Networks, 17, 3, 366-381.
  24. MACKOVÁ, L., HARMÁČEK, J. (2019). The Motivation and reality of Return Migration to Armenia. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 8, 2, 145-160.
  25. MASSEY, D. S., ARANGO, J., HUGO, G., KOUAOUCI, A., PELLEGRINO, A., TAYLOR, J. E., (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19, 3, 431-466.
  26. PAASCHE, E. (2016). The role of corruption in reintegration: experiences of Iraqi Kurds upon return from Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 7, 1076-1093.
  27. PAWLOWSKA, K. (2017). Ethnic return of Armenian Americans: Perspectives. Anthropological notebooks, 23, 1, 93-109.
  28. PYTEL, S. (2018). International migrations of Polish pensioners in the context of the cumulative causation theory. Folia Geographica, 60, 1, 74-84.
  29. Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia (2022). Migration Profile of the Republic of Armenia in 2020. Available at: https://armstat.am/file/article/migration_profile__2020_en.pdf. [Accessed 23 August 2022].
  30. SAFRASTYAN, R. (2011). Ottoman Empire. The Genesis of the Program of Genocide (1876-1920). Yerevan: Zangak.
  31. STARK, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
  32. State Migration Service (2017). 2017-2021 Strategy for migration policy of the Republic of Armenia. Available at: http://smsmta.am/upload/Migration_Strategy_2017-2021_english.pdf. [Accessed 26 February 2022].
  33. THOMAS, R. L., VARDANYAN, Y., YAGALOFF, L., DIAMOND, L. (2018). Remittances: The Impact on Families in Armenia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39, 3, 634-646
  34. UHER, A., IRA, V. (2019). Life-paths of Serbs in the context of conflicts in former Yugoslavia. Folia Geographica, 61, 2, 25-44.